Love at First Page

I don’t believe in love at first sight and if you start talking about it, I’ll likely roll my eyes at you and sigh in your face (rude, I know). However! When it comes to reading, I do believe in love at first page.

Continue reading

Cover Art Matters…At Least To Me

This post might come off as (incredibly) whiny to some of you, but if you can’t tell from my weekly Judging posts, I appreciate the cover art and overall design of my books. That’s not to say every book in my library must be pretty. In fact, I love used books and oftentimes when casually browsing, I’m not looking for specifics when it comes to cover art. However, there are several books that I collect multiple copies of, solely for their art and design and other times I see a pretty series or cover design and I want that one!

Continue reading

Judging A Book By Its Cover: The Hobbit (VII)

This is my weekly post where I highlight and appreciate cover designs and the general physical appearance of books. We all judge book covers to some extent. I can’t say that I’ve ever decided against a book with terrible cover art if I liked the sound of the plot, but I have purchased special editions of books or multiple editions of books based on their cover art. If book covers didn’t matter, publishers wouldn’t put out so many beautiful editions!

A friend was going to get rid of this old box set, but smartly asked if I wanted it first. The books are pretty beat up, to the point where they’re unreadable because the spines have all separated from the covers. But I like the box they come in and their simplistic covers (even if they have yellowed with age). This set was published in the late 1970s by Houghton Mifflin. The pages themselves aren’t really photo-worthy and I don’t like to open the books since they’re already falling to pieces, but The Hobbit does have the standard illustrations throughout.

Judging A Book By Its Cover: The Hobbit, Etc. (VI)

This is my weekly post where I highlight and appreciate cover designs and the general physical appearance of books. We all judge book covers to some extent. I can’t say that I’ve ever decided against a book with terrible cover art if I liked the sound of the plot, but I have purchased special editions of books, or multiple editions of books based on their cover art. If book covers didn’t matter, publishers wouldn’t put out so many beautiful editions!

These vintage beauties are 1965 editions put out by Ballantine Books and are apparently the only editions “authorized” by Tolkien. They even have a wonderful seal of approval stamped all over their crazy colorful covers. These covers are on crack and I love them. No illustrations, sadly, though the Tolkien Reader does have a few.

Nostalgia Reads: The Hobbit

nos·tal·gia [no-stal-juh] – noun:

A sentimental longing or wistful affection for the past, typically for a period or place with happy personal associations.

What happens when a band of dwarves sets out on a journey to avenge their relatives and regain their mountain hold full of treasure from a fearsome dragon? Well, they need a burglar of course, and the trusty wizard Gandalf knows just who to procure – little Bilbo Baggins, a hobbit living comfortably in his family home, eating eleven square meals a day (plus snacks of course!). Bashful Biblo seems like a hopeless edition to the band of sturdy dwarves, until they start getting into trouble and the only one who can help them is their burglar!

image from google

Now, I’m going to assume most of you have heard of this book (at the very least, because of the recent movie adaptations). It’s a book I make an effort to re-read every year because it’s just such fun to read – and it’s a quick read so I don’t feel guilty about not reading a book I’ve never read before. I do remember reading The Hobbit in fifth grade for a reading assignment (primarily because if I read it and aced the quiz I’d get all the points I needed for that assignment and I wouldn’t have to read any of the other assigned books), but before that, I recall watching the (strange) illustrated movie. Please, someone, tell me you remember this gem:

images from google

Looking back, I can say that this is a somewhat bizarre adaptation considering the mental images I’ve created after reading the book on my own and those that the movie franchise has provided us – especially where Gollum is concerned. I mean, I can sort of understand that maybe all that time at the lake in the cave would give him some amphibian attributes, but I think they lost a little too much of his humanity. That aside, if this movie was on Netflix right now (it’s not – I checked), I would abandon writing this post to watch it. I remember a lot of singing and I was definitely drawn in by Bilbo’s friggin huge eyes.

This film, simply titled The Hobbit, aired in 1977 as a TV special and was directed by Rankin & Bass (where are my Year Without A Santa Claus fans at?). The music in the movie was heavily influenced by the songs Tolkien wrote in the book, though Rankin & Bass did add a completely original song “The Ballad of the Hobbit.” I’ve just found out, it was released on DVD as well, and you can rest assured that I just added it to my Amazon cart!

image from google

The Hobbit was first published in 1937, and in researching this post, I found that Tolkien actually sent the manuscript to some colleagues first. It was one of his colleagues that gave the manuscript to Stanley Unwin, the head of publishing house George Allen and Unwin. Stanley had his ten-year-old son read and review the manuscript, since he was the target audience. The boy’s positive review was what led to the publisher’s decision to print the book! The book was an immediate success and I would say, still is a large success – it has been translated into over 40 languages and nominated for a few awards and has won the International Fantasy Award and the Keith Barker Millennium Book Award. Have I heard of either of these awards? No, but I still felt it worth mentioning.

After first reading the book for school (I did get full points on that quiz, by the way), I can’t say that my love for the book was immediate. I do remember being surprised that I enjoyed it, but also thinking that maybe there was more going on that I just wasn’t picking up on. I’m not sure how many years passed before I read the book again, but I know since then I’ve read the book at least six or seven times (probably more – wishing I’d started tracking my reading habits many years earlier!) and each time I read it, I enjoy it even more. Those of you who like to re-read books will understand when I say that for every re-read, I pick up on some new little tidbit or detail that I’ve never noticed before.

Now, my hobbitlove is strong and I especially enjoy reading the book aloud (even if I’m only reading to myself), and while there are certainly more hardcore Tolkien fans than me (confession: this is the only one of his books I’ve read! Don’t kill me), I don’t think you’re ever too old (or young, probably) to give this book a chance. It’s less daunting than the Lord of the Rings trilogy, and while it doesn’t delve too far into the history and the land of Middle Earth, it’s an excellent primer. I don’t see what’s not to love about Bilbo! He’s tiny, charming, clever, and like myself enjoys order and routine but secretly craves adventure.

Clearly I’m not alone considering the various movies (like the ridiculous three-movie adaptation of The Hobbit) and merchandise made from The Hobbit and Lord of the Rings. Not to mention, the immense fandom, from cosplayers to fanfic writers and let’s not forget those who learned Elvish!

art by victorior

I’m not exactly sure when it happened, but at some point, there was more than one edition of The Hobbit in my personal library. And so, like Smaug with his dwarven gold, I began my Hobbit hoard. It feels like my love for the book grows more each year, and because of that (and also because I’m a certified book hoarder), I now have 11 copies of The Hobbit and 3 full sets of the Lord of the Rings trilogy.

Some have colored illustrations, some black and white and I’m pretty sure at least one of them has no illustrations at all (sadness!) Hopefully someday my mum will let me adopt her editions from the 70s….I’d like to get my hands on an annotated edition too.

20140412_124104

IMG_5379

IMG_5431r

Another little tidbit I found in my internet wanderings was that Maurice Sendak (of Where the Wild Things Are fame) could have had a shot at doing some illustrations for The Hobbit! How fantastic would that have been? Sadly, when Tolkien asked Sendak for a few samples, Sendak’s work was mislabeled by the editor and when Tolkien saw wood elves labeled as hobbits, he felt that Sendak didn’t read his work carefully enough. Before the two could meet in person and clear up the misunderstanding, Sendak ended up having his first heart attack and the two never broached the subject again.

image from google

I can only imagine what an excellent edition that would make – especially if the illustrations were in full color! I almost wished I hadn’t come across this information, because now I’ll just lament not being able to own an edition that doesn’t exist.

So tell me, have you read The Hobbit? Do you share my unbridled hobbitlove? If you haven’t read it yet, why not? Are you wondering why I didn’t talk about the recent movie adaptations? It’s because I think they’re garbage! (Though Bannister Crumblebench did a great voice for Smaug.) Care to debate this? Hit me up in the comments!

Judging A Book By Its Cover: The Hobbitses (IV)

IMG_5399e

This is my weekly post where I choose to appreciate a book for its cover art or overall design – to me, a well designed book is like a piece of art. We all judge book covers to some extent. Personally, it’s usually a title/cover combination that pulls me in when I’m browsing in a bookstore. I can’t say that I’ve ever decided against a book with terrible cover art if I liked the sound of the plot, but I have purchased special editions of books, or multiple editions of books based on their cover art. If book covers didn’t matter, publishers (looking at you, Penguin!) wouldn’t put out so many beautiful editions!

IMG_5400e

All the Hobbitses! Just showing off some of my more modern editions of The Hobbit. I don’t have any of the publishing info because most of my books are currently packed away (we’re moving!) and I’m too lazy to Google these (sorry!). The edition on the top is possibly a UK version, as I needed to get it on Book Depository, since I couldn’t find it on Amazon. The bottom edition with the orange spine was the first copy I bought myself and probably still my favorite since I’ve read that edition so many times. All three books at least have little illustrated accents, if not full-page pictures.

IMG_5380e

IMG_5381e

IMG_5382e

IMG_5383e

IMG_5384e

IMG_5387e

IMG_5388e

IMG_5390e

IMG_5393e

IMG_5394e

IMG_5395e

IMG_5396e

IMG_5397e

Judging A Book By Its Cover: The Hobbit (III)

IMG_5424r

This is my weekly post where I choose to appreciate a book for its cover art or overall design – to me, a well designed book is like a piece of art. We all judge book covers to some extent. Personally, it’s usually a title/cover combination that pulls me in when I’m browsing in a bookstore. I can’t say that I’ve ever decided against a book with terrible cover art if I liked the sound of the plot, but I have purchased special editions of books, or multiple editions of books based on their cover art. If book covers didn’t matter, publishers (looking at you, Penguin!) wouldn’t put out so many beautiful editions!

IMG_5425r

I bought this special edition of The Hobbit from a shop on Instagram. It’s the Collectors Edition by Houghton Mifflin and I believe it was published in 1973. It’s got green accents and cool runes everywhere, as well as some green and black illustrations and some full color plates. I’m missing the box it comes in, but that doesn’t matter to me. ISBN: 9780395177112.

IMG_5432r

IMG_5426r

IMG_5427r

IMG_5429r

IMG_5431r

Judging A Book By Its Cover: The Hobbit (II)

IMG_5373

This is my weekly post where I choose to appreciate a book for its cover art or overall design – to me, a well designed book is like a piece of art. We all judge book covers to some extent. Personally, it’s usually a title/cover combination that pulls me in when I’m browsing in a bookstore. I can’t say that I’ve ever decided against a book with terrible cover art if I liked the sound of the plot, but I have purchased special editions of books, or multiple editions of books based on their cover art. If book covers didn’t matter, publishers (looking at you, Penguin!) wouldn’t put out so many beautiful editions!

IMG_5379

It’s been a while since I showed off one of my Hobbit editions – yes, I have multiples of this book as well, though not nearly as many copies as I have in Pride and Prejudice or Alice in Wonderland. This little edition is Hobbit-sized at about 6 inches tall. It was published in 2007 by HarperCollins and has a leather (imitation? who cares?) cover and gilded edges, though it could use a little ribbon bookmark. It’s an edition that I want to keep pristine, yet I also want to read it over and over until the leather becomes broken in and keep it my purse so that it’s always with me. ISBN: 9780544045521

IMG_5374

IMG_5375

IMG_5376

IMG_5378

IMG_5377

Judging A Book By Its Cover: The Hobbit

I know we’re all familiar with that old phrase, “Never judge a book by its cover” and I’d like to think that as book fans, we try extra hard to follow that rule (both literally and more metaphorically in relation to all areas of life). But let’s be real guys, we do judge books by their covers. If we didn’t, publishers wouldn’t keep putting out different cover designs for our favorite novels!

Continue reading